Disease Overview
The World Health Organization (WHO) classifies chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) as a myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MDS/MPN).[1] The WHO recognizes a dysplastic subtype and a proliferative subtype, with prognostic groups differentiated by the circulating white blood cell (WBC) count or the percentage of blasts in the bone marrow (higher percentage with worse prognosis).[2]
CMML is a clonal disorder of a bone marrow stem cell. Monocytosis is a major defining feature. CMML exhibits heterogenous clinical, hematological, and morphological features, varying from predominantly myelodysplastic to predominantly myeloproliferative. Evolution to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) portends a particularly poor prognosis.[3]
CMML is characterized pathologically by:[4,5]
- Persistent monocytosis is greater than 1 × 109/L in the peripheral blood.
- No Philadelphia chromosome or BCR::ABL1 gene fusion.
- No PDGFRA and PDGFRB rearrangement.
- Fewer than 20% blasts in the blood or bone marrow (including monoblasts/promonocytes).
- Dysplasia involving one or more myeloid lineages or, if myelodysplasia is absent or minimal, either an acquired clonal cytogenetic bone marrow abnormality or at least 3 months of persistent peripheral blood monocytosis, if all other causes are ruled out.
Clinical features of CMML include:[4,5]
- Fever, fatigue, night sweats, and weight loss. For more information, see Fatigue, Hot Flashes and Night Sweats, and Nutrition in Cancer Care.
- Infection.
- Bleeding caused by thrombocytopenia.
- Hepatomegaly (in some patients).
- Splenomegaly (in some patients).
- In patients with a WBC count that is within reference range or slightly decreased, clinical features may be identical to MDS.
- In patients with elevated WBC count, features are more like chronic myeloproliferative disorders, including more frequent splenomegaly and hepatomegaly.
The median age at diagnosis of CMML is 65 to 75 years with a male predominance of 1.5 to 3.1.[4,5] Because CMML is grouped with chronic myeloid leukemia in some epidemiologic surveys and with MDS in others, no reliable incidence data are available for CMML.[6] Although the specific etiology of CMML is unknown, exposure to occupational and environmental carcinogens, ionizing radiation, and cytotoxic agents has been associated in some cases.[6]
Morphologically, the disease is characterized by a persistent peripheral blood monocytosis (always >1 × 109/L) that may exceed 80 × 109/L with monocytes typically accounting for more than 10% of the WBCs.[4,5] Monocytes, though typically mature with an unremarkable morphology, can exhibit abnormal granulation, unusual nuclear lobation, or finely dispersed nuclear chromatin.[7] Fewer than 20% blasts are seen in the blood or bone marrow. Neutrophilia occurs in nearly 50% of patients with neutrophil precursors (e.g., promyelocytes and myelocytes) accounting for more than 10% of the WBCs.[8] Mild normocytic anemia is common. Moderate thrombocytopenia is often present. Bone marrow findings include:[4,5,9,10]
- Hypercellularity (75% of cases).
- Blast count less than 20%.
- Granulocytic proliferation (with dysgranulopoiesis).
- Monocytic proliferation, dyserythropoiesis (e.g., megaloblastic changes, abnormal nuclear contours, ringed sideroblasts, etc.).
- Micromegakaryocytes and/or megakaryocytes with abnormally lobated nuclei (as many as 80% of the cases).
- Fibrosis (30% of the cases).
Hepatosplenomegaly may be present.[4,5] Autoimmune phenomena, including pyoderma gangrenosum, vasculitis, and idiopathic thrombocytopenia have been observed in CMML.[11] Care should be taken to identify cases of CMML with eosinophilia, a subtype of CMML, because of its association with severe tissue damage secondary to eosinophil degranulation. In CMML with eosinophilia, all criteria for CMML are present, and the eosinophil count in the peripheral blood is more than 1.5 × 109/L.[6]
Recurrent somatic pathogenic variants have been identified in most patients with CMML, resulting in altered signaling molecules (especially NRAS, KRAS, JAK2, and SETBP1), epigenetic regulators (especially TET2 and ASXL1), splicing factors (especially SRSF2), and transcription factors (especially RUNX1).[12–15] A CMML-specific prognostic scoring system can distinguish four risk groups based on the following factors:[16]
- Red blood cell transfusion dependency.
- WBC count at least 13 × 109/L.
- Bone marrow blasts at least 5%.
- Genetic risk group based on cytogenetics (trisomy 8, ≥3 abnormalities on karyotype, or chromosome 7 abnormalities are high risk), and pathogenic variants in ASXL1, NRAS, RUNX1, or SETBP1.
The best prognostic group has a median survival of more than 10 years with no leukemic evolution in the first decade of follow-up. The worst prognostic group has a median survival of 20 months with a 50% evolution to AML by 2 years.[16]
Prognostic factors associated with shorter survival include:[17,18]
- Low hemoglobin level.
- Low platelet count; high WBC, monocyte, and lymphocyte counts.
- Presence of circulating immature myeloid cells.
- High percentage of marrow blasts.
- Low percentage of marrow erythroid cells.
- Abnormal molecular genetic data.
- High levels of serum lactate dehydrogenase and beta-2-microglobulin.
Progression to acute leukemia occurs in approximately 15% to 20% of cases.[17,18]
CPSS-Mol is a CMML-specific prognostic scoring system that incorporates molecular genetic data, especially pathogenic variants in RUNX1, NRAS, SETBP1, and ASXL1. This system distinguishes low-risk disease with median survivals longer than 10 years from high-risk disease with median survivals of 2 to 4 years.[16]
Treatment Overview
CMML is a diagnosis typically made after age 70 years. The clinical course of CMML ranges from indolent or smoldering disease to an aggressive disease progression culminating in severe cytopenias or evolution to acute leukemia. Assessment of the risk factors and the pace of disease over time may help to distinguish patients who require therapy from those who would be best managed with a watchful waiting approach. Asymptomatic patients at low risk of progression may be best served by forgoing therapy.[19,20]
Allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT)
Patients with high-risk disease who are young enough and fit enough may undergo allogeneic SCT. This represents the only potential cure for CMML. Hypomethylating agents like azacitidine and decitabine are usually given prior to allogeneic SCT for cytoreduction or to ameliorate cytopenias.[21,22] Retrospective reports that included small numbers of patients with CMML (range, 12–80) who underwent allogeneic SCT reported recurrence rates of 20% to 40% and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of approximately 20% to 30%.[23–28][Level of evidence C3]
A retrospective review of 1,114 patients with CMML diagnosed between 2000 and 2014 included 384 patients who underwent allogeneic SCT.[29] With a median follow-up of 51 to 78 months (in two data sets), allogeneic SCT in patients with low-risk CMML was detrimental, with a 5-year OS rates of 20% for patients who underwent allogeneic SCT and 42% for patients who did not undergo allogeneic SCT (P < .001).[29][Level of evidence C1] For patients with high-risk CMML, there was no statistically significant difference in 5-year OS rates among patients treated with or without allogeneic SCT (27% vs. 15%, respectively; P = .13).
Hypomethylating agents
Two randomized prospective clinical trials compared the hypomethylating agent, azacitidine, with best supportive care in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). The trials involved large numbers of patients with MDS but also included small numbers of patients (fewer than 25) with CMML.[30,31] The overall response rates exceeded 60% for all patients who received azacitidine, but the data did not allow an assessment specifically for patients with CMML.[30,31][Level of evidence C3] Several phase II trials reported response rates of 30% to 60% for patients with CMML who received hypomethylating agents.[32–36] Azacitidine and decitabine may reverse cytopenias, cytoreduce elevated WBC counts, reduce splenic size, and improve clinical symptoms (like decreased appetite or itching).
Hydroxyurea
Hydroxyurea has been given for other diseases with chronic myeloproliferation, such as thrombocythemia and myelofibrosis. These applications suggest the use of hydroxyurea for CMML with leukocytosis, thrombocytosis, or splenomegaly.[37] In a randomized prospective clinical trial of 105 patients with CMML, hydroxyurea (up to 4 g/day) was compared with etoposide.[38] With a median follow-up of 11 months, the median OS was 20 months in patients who received hydroxyurea and 9 months in patients who received etoposide (P < .0001).[38][Level of evidence A1]
Hypomethylating agent versus hydroxyurea
In a prospective randomized trial, 170 patients with newly diagnosed advanced CMML received intravenous decitabine or hydroxyurea (1–4 g/day). With a median follow-up of 17.5 months, there was no statistically significant difference in event-free survival (12.1 months for patients who received decitabine and 10.3 months for patients who received hydroxyurea; hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59–1.16; P = .27). There was also no statistically significant difference in median OS (16.3 months for patients who received decitabine and 21.9 months for patients who received hydroxyurea; P = .67).[39][Level of evidence A1] Although decitabine reduced CMML progression or transformation to AML by 38% compared with hydroxyurea, this was offset by a 55% increase in deaths that were not caused by progression (the deaths were usually related to infection). There are no data to suggest that systematic antibiotic prophylaxis would have helped the patients who received decitabine.
Other regimens
In a phase II trial, 13 hypomethylating agent–naive patients with high-risk CMML were treated with azacitidine or decitabine plus venetoclax. With a median follow-up of 14.1 months, the overall response rate was 85% (11 of 13 patients), including two with complete response and a median duration of response of 17.9 months.[40,41][Level of evidence C3] Six of these patients underwent subsequent allogeneic SCT.
A retrospective study included 21 patients with high-risk CMML who received cladribine plus low-dose cytarabine alternating with azacitidine or decitabine. The patients had an objective response rate of 33% (50% in patients with hypomethylating agent–naive CMML and 23% in patients with hypomethylating agent–failure CMML).[41][Level of evidence C3]
A phase I/II study of 23 patients with mostly high-risk MDS and greater than 5% marrow blast cells involved 10 patients with CMML. All patients received azacitidine plus venetoclax. With a median follow-up of 13.2 months, the overall response rate was 87% (95% CI, 66%–97%).[42][Level of evidence C3]