Category: Hem/Onc Updates

FDA Approves TUKYSA® for HER2+ Breast Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: The FDA on April 17, 2020, approved TUKYSA® (Tucatinib) in combination with Trastuzumab and XELODA® (Capecitabine), for adult patients with advanced unresectable or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer, including patients with brain metastases, who have received one or more prior anti-HER2-based regimens in the metastatic setting. Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the US and about 1 in 8 women (13%) will develop invasive breast cancer during their lifetime. Approximately 276,480 new cases of invasive female breast cancer will be diagnosed in 2020 and about 42,170 women will die of the disease.

The HER or erbB family of receptors consist of HER1, HER2, HER3 and HER4. Approximately 15-20% of invasive breast cancers overexpress HER2/neu oncogene, which is a negative predictor of outcomes without systemic therapy. Patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer are often treated with anti-HER2 targeted therapy along with chemotherapy, irrespective of hormone receptor status, and this has resulted in significantly improved treatment outcomes. HER2-targeted therapies include HERCEPTIN® (Trastuzumab), TYKERB® (Lapatinib), PERJETA® (Pertuzumab) and KADCYLA® (ado-Trastuzumab emtansine). Dual HER2 blockade with HERCEPTIN® and PERJETA®, given along with chemotherapy (with or without endocrine therapy), as first line treatment, in HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer patients, was shown to significantly improve Progression Free Survival (PFS) as well as Overall Survival (OS). The superior benefit with dual HER2 blockade has been attributed to differing mechanisms of action and synergistic interaction between HER2 targeted therapies. Patients progressing on Dual HER2 blockade often receive KADCYLA® which results in an Objective Response Rate (ORR) of 44% and a median PFS of 9.6 months, when administered after HERCEPTIN® and a taxane. There is however no standard treatment option for this patient population following progression on KADCYLA®.

It is estimated that close to 50% of patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer develop brain metastases. Systemic HER2-targeted agents, including Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors, as well as chemotherapy have limited antitumor activity in the brain. Local therapeutic interventions for brain metastases include neurosurgical resection and Stereotactic or Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy.

TUKYSA® (Tucatinib) is an oral Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor that is highly selective for the kinase domain of HER2 with minimal inhibition of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor. In a Phase 1b dose-escalation trial, TUKYSA® in combination with HERCEPTIN® and XELODA® (Capecitabine) showed encouraging antitumor activity in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, including those with brain metastases.

HER2CLIMB is an international, randomized, double-blind trial in which the combination of TUKYSA® plus HERCEPTIN® and XELODA® was compared with placebo plus HERCEPTIN® and XELODA®. A total of 612 patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer, who were previously treated with HERCEPTIN®, PERJETA® (Pertuzumab) and KADCYLA® (ado-Trastuzumab emtansine) were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive either TUKYSA® 300 mg orally twice daily throughout the treatment period (N=410) or placebo orally twice daily (N=201), in combination with HERCEPTIN® 6 mg/kg IV once every 21 days, following an initial loading dose of 8 mg/kg, and XELODA® 1000 mg/m2 orally twice daily on days 1 to 14 of each 21-day cycle. Stratification factors included presence or absence of brain metastases, ECOG Performance Status and geographic region. The median patient age was 54 years and patient demographic as well as disease characteristics at baseline were well balanced between the two treatment groups. In the total treatment population, 47.5% had brain metastases at baseline, 48.3% in the TUKYSA® combination group and 46% in the placebo combination group. The median duration of follow up in the total treatment population was 14 months. The Primary endpoint was Progression Free Survival (PFS) among the first 480 patients who underwent randomization. Secondary end points assessed in the total treatment population (612 patients) included, Overall Survival (OS), PFS among patients with brain metastases, confirmed Objective Response Rate (ORR), and safety.

The Primary endpoint of PFS at 1 year was 33.1% in the TUKYSA®-combination group and 12.3% in the placebo-combination group (HR for disease progression or death=0.54; P<0.001), and the median duration of PFS was 7.8 months and 5.6 months, respectively. This represented a 46% reduction in the risk of cancer progression or death in the TUKYSA®-combination group compared to patients who received HERCEPTIN® and XELODA® alone. The Overall Survival at 2 years was 44.9% in the TUKYSA®-combination group and 26.6% in the placebo-combination group (HR for death=0.66; P=0.005), and the median Overall Survival was 21.9 months and 17.4 months, respectively. This represented a 44% reduction in the risk of death in the TUKYSA®-combination group compared to the placebo-combination group. Among the patients with brain metastases, PFS at 1 year was 24.9% in the TUKYSA®-combination group and 0% in the placebo-combination group (HR=0.48; P<0.001), and the median PFS was 7.6 months and 5.4 months, respectively. This represented a 52% reduction in the risk of cancer progression or death in the TUKYSA®-combination group compared to the placebo-combination group. Among the patients with measurable disease at baseline, the confirmed Objective Response Rate was 40.6% in the TUKYSA®-combination group and 22.8% in the placebo-combination group (P<0.001). Common adverse events in the TUKYSA® group included diarrhea, Palmar-Plantar Erythrodysesthesia syndrome, nausea, vomiting and fatigue. Diarrhea and abnormal liver function tests were more common in the TUKYSA®-combination group than in the placebo-combination group.

It was concluded that in heavily pretreated patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, including those with brain metastases, the addition of TUKYSA® to HERCEPTIN® and XELODA® resulted in clinically significant improvement in PFS and OS, compared to the placebo-combination group. This trial is unique in that it included patients with active brain metastases, either untreated or progressing.

Tucatinib, Trastuzumab, and Capecitabine for HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer. Murthy RK, Loi S, Okines A, et al. N Engl J Med 2020;382:597-609.

FDA Approves PEMAZYRE®, First Targeted Therapy for Cholangiocarcinoma

RR

SUMMARY: The FDA on April 17, 2020 granted accelerated approval to PEMAZYRE® (Pemigatinib), for the treatment of adults with previously treated, unresectable locally advanced or metastatic Cholangiocarcinoma with a Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 2 (FGFR2) fusion or other rearrangement, as detected by an FDA-approved test. The FDA also approved the FoundationOne® CDX (Foundation Medicine, Inc.), as a companion diagnostic for patient selection.

Bile Duct cancer (Cholangiocarcinoma), comprise about 30% of all primary liver tumors and includes both intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile duct cancers. Klatskin tumor is a type of Cholangiocarcinoma that begins in the hilum, at the junction of the left and right bile ducts. It is the most common type of Cholangiocarcinoma, accounting for more than half of all cases. About 8,000 people in the US are diagnosed with Cholangiocarcinoma each year and approximately 20% of the cases are suitable for surgical resection, whereas a majority of patients at diagnosis have advanced disease. The 5-year survival is less than 10%, with limited progress made over the past two decades. There is therefore an unmet need for new effective therapies.

FGFRs (Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptors) play an important role in tumor cell proliferation and survival, migration and angiogenesis. Activating fusions, rearrangements, translocations and gene amplifications in FGFRs result in dysregulation of FGFR signaling, and may contribute to the pathogenesis of various cancers, including Cholangiocarcinoma. FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements occur almost exclusively in intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma, where they are observed in 10-16% of patients. PEMAZYRE® is a potent, selective, oral kinase inhibitor of FGFR isoforms 1, 2 and 3, which in preclinical studies has demonstrated selective pharmacologic activity against cancer cells with FGFR alterations.FGFR-Signaling-Pathway

The FIGHT-202 ((FIbroblast Growth factor receptor in oncology and Hematology Trials) is a Phase II, multi-center, open-label, single-arm study which evaluated the safety and efficacy of PEMAZYRE® (Pemigatinib) in adult patients with previously treated, locally advanced or metastatic Cholangiocarcinoma with documented FGFR2 fusion or rearrangement. Patients were enrolled into one of three cohorts: Cohort A with FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements (N=107), Cohort B with other FGF/FGFR genetic alterations (N=20) or Cohort C with no FGF/FGFR genetic alterations (N=18). All patients received PEMAZYRE® 13.5 mg orally once daily, two weeks on and one week off, on a 21-day cycle, until radiological disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The median patient age of the entire enrolled patient group was 59 years and patients were scanned every eight weeks to assess response to PEMAZYRE®. The Primary endpoint of FIGHT-202 was Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Cohort A, assessed by Independent Review per RECIST criteria. Secondary endpoints included ORR in Cohorts B, A plus B, and C, Duration of Response (DOR), Disease Control Rate (DCR), Progression Free Survival (PFS), Overall Survival (OS), and safety.

It was noted that PEMAZYRE® monotherapy resulted in an Objective Response Rate of 36%, with Complete Response Rate of 2.8% and a Partial Response Rate of 33%. Among those who had a response, 63% had a response lasting 6 months or longer and 18% had a response lasting 12 months or longer. The median Duration of Response was 7.5 months and the Disease Control Rate (DCR) was 82%. The median PFS and median OS were 6.9 months and 21.1 months, and the OS data was not mature at the time of data cutoff. In Cohorts B and C, none of the patients achieved a response. The most common Adverse Events were hyperphosphatemia, alopecia, diarrhea, fatigue, nail toxicities and dysgeusia. Hyperphosphatemia was managed with diet modifications, phosphate binders, diuretics or dose modifications. Fewer patients discontinued therapy in Cohort A compared to Cohort B and C.

It was concluded that based on Overall Response Rate and Duration of Response, PEMAZYRE® is the first and only FDA-approved treatment for previously treated patients with Cholangiocarcinoma, harboring FGFR2 gene rearrangements or fusions.

Pemigatinib for previously treated, locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 study. Abou-Alfa GK, Sahai V, Hollebecque A, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Mar 20. pii: S1470-2045(20)30109-1. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30109-1. [Epub ahead of print]

FDA Approves BRAFTOVI® in Combination with ERBITUX® for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: The FDA on April 8, 2020, approved BRAFTOVI® (Encorafenib) in combination with ERBITUX® (Cetuximab) for the treatment of adult patients with metastatic ColoRectal Cancer (CRC) with a BRAF V600E mutation, detected by an FDA-approved test, after prior therapy. Colorectal Cancer is the third most common cancer diagnosed in both men and women in the United States. The American Cancer Society estimates that approximately 147,950 new cases of CRC will be diagnosed in the United States in 2020 and about 53,200 patients are expected to die of the disease. The lifetime risk of developing CRC is about 1 in 23.

Advanced colon cancer is often incurable and standard chemotherapy when combined with anti EGFR (Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor) targeted monoclonal antibodies such as VECTIBIX® (Panitumumab) and ERBITUX® (Cetuximab) as well as anti VEGF agent AVASTIN® (Bevacizumab), have demonstrated improvement in Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS). The benefit with anti EGFR agents however is only demonstrable in patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC), whose tumors do not harbor KRAS mutations in codons 12 and 13 of exon 2 (KRAS Wild Type). It is now also clear that even among the KRAS Wild Type patient group about 15-20% have other rare mutations such as NRAS and BRAF mutations, which confer resistance to anti EGFR agents. Patients with stage IV colorectal cancer are now routinely analyzed for extended RAS and BRAF mutations. KRAS mutations are predictive of resistance to EGFR targeted therapy. Approximately 8-15% of all metastatic CRC tumors present with BRAF V600E mutations and BRAF V600E is recognized as a marker of poor prognosis in this patient group. These patients tend to have aggressive disease with a higher rate of peritoneal metastasis and do not respond well to standard treatment intervention. Approximately 20% of the BRAF-mutated population in the metastatic setting has MSI-High tumors, but MSI-High status does not confer protection to this patient group.BRAF-and-MEK-Inhibition-in-MAPK-Pathway

The Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase pathway (MAPK pathway) is an important signaling pathway which enables the cell to respond to external stimuli. This pathway plays a dual role, regulating cytokine production and participating in cytokine dependent signaling cascade. The MAPK pathway of interest is the RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK pathway. The RAF family of kinases includes ARAF, BRAF and CRAF signaling molecules. BRAF is a very important intermediary of the RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK pathway. The BRAF V600E mutations results in constitutive activation of the MAP kinase pathway. Inhibiting BRAF can transiently reduce MAP kinase signaling. However, this can result in feedback upregulation of EGFR signaling pathway, which can then reactivate the MAP kinase pathway. This aberrant signaling can be blocked by dual inhibition of both BRAF and EGFR. It should be noted that BRAF V600E-mutated CRC is inherently less sensitive to BRAF inhibition than Malignant Melanoma.

BRAFTOVI® (Encorafenib) is a BRAF inhibitor and has target binding characteristics that differ from other BRAF inhibitors such as ZELBORAF® (Vemurafenib) and TAFINLAR® (Dabrafenib), with a prolonged target dissociation half-life and higher potency. The combination of BRAFTOVI® along with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody ERBITUX® (Cetuximab) showed promising activity in early-phase clinical trials.

The present FDA approval was based on BEACON CRC (Binimetinib, Encorafenib, and Cetuximab Combined to Treat BRAF-Mutant Colorectal Cancer) trial, which is an international, multicenter, randomized, open-label, Phase III study in which the efficacy and safety of BRAFTOVI® plus ERBITUX® with or without a MEK inhibitor MEKTOVI® (Binimetinib), was compared with the investigators’ choice of ERBITUX® combined with either Irinotecan or Fluorouracil, Folinic acid, and Irinotecan, in patients with BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC, whose disease has progressed after one or two prior regimens. Eligible patients were required to have BRAF V600E mutation-positive metastatic CRC (detected by the Qiagen therascreen® BRAF V600E RGQ PCR kit), with disease progression after one or two prior regimens. In this trial, 665 patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive either triplet therapy of BRAFTOVI® 300 mg orally daily, MEKTOVI® 45 mg orally twice daily, and ERBITUX® 400 mg/m2 IV as an initial dose, then 250 mg/m2 IV weekly (N=224), doublet-therapy of BRAFTOVI® and ERBITUX® administered in the same doses and on the same schedule as the triplet regimen (N=220) or investigators’ choice of ERBITUX® combined with either Irinotecan or Fluorouracil, Folinic acid, and Irinotecan (N=221). Patients were stratified according to previous Irinotecan use and treatment was administered in 28-day cycles until disease progression. The co-Primary end points were Overall Survival (OS) in the triplet-therapy group as compared with the control group and Secondary end points included OS in the doublet-therapy group as compared with the control group, as well as Progression Free Survival, Duration of Response, and Safety in all groups. This study was not powered to compare the triplet-therapy group against the doublet-therapy group. The Overall Response Rate (ORR) and Duration of Response were assessed by blinded Independent Central Review in the subset of the first 220 patients assigned to receive either BRAFTOVI® and ERBITUX® or the control group.

The median OS was 8.4 months in the BRAFTOVI® plus ERBITUX® group, compared to 5.4 months in the control group (HR=0.60; P=0.0003), and this represented 40% reduction in the risk of death among the BRAFTOVI® plus ERBITUX® group. Median PFS was 4.2 months in the BRAFTOVI® plus ERBITUX® group compared to 1.5 months in the control group (HR=0.40; P< 0.0001). The ORR was 20% and 2% respectively. The median Duration of Response was 6.1 months for the BRAFTOVI® plus ERBITUX® group and Not Reached in the control arm. The median OS was 9.0 months in the triplet-therapy group and 5.4 months in the control group (HR for death=0.52; P<0.001). This represented 48% reduction in the risk of death in the triplet-therapy group. Both the triplet and doublet regimens reduced the risk of Quality of Life (QoL) deterioration by about 45% by different QoL assessment instruments, compared with the control regimen. The most common adverse reactions in the BRAFTOVI® plus ERBITUX® group were fatigue, nausea, diarrhea, dermatitis acneiform, abdominal pain, decreased appetite, arthralgia, and rash.

It was concluded from the BEACON CRC trial that a combination of BRAFTOVI®, MEKTOVI® and ERBITUX® as well as a combination of BRAFTOVI® plus ERBITUX® resulted in significantly longer Overall Survival and a higher Response Rate than standard therapy, in patients with metastatic Colorectal Cancer, with the BRAF V600E mutation.
Encorafenib, Binimetinib, and Cetuximab in BRAF V600E-Mutated Colorectal Cancer. Kopetz S, Grothey A, Yaeger R, et al. N Engl J Med 2019; 381:1632-1643

FDA Approves KEYTRUDA® for BCG-Unresponsive, High-Risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: The FDA on January 8, 2020, approved KEYTRUDA® (Pembrolizumab) for the treatment of patients with Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG)-unresponsive, high-risk, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC) with Carcinoma In Situ (CIS) with or without papillary tumors, who are ineligible for or have elected not to undergo cystectomy.

The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2020, about 81,400 new cases of bladder cancer will be diagnosed in the US and about 17,980 patients will die of the disease. Bladder cancer is the fourth most common cancer in men, but is less common in women and the average age at the time of diagnosis is 73. Approximately 50% of all bladder cancers are non-invasive or in situ cancers. Patients with high-risk, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer that has become unresponsive to BCG treatment, are often given the treatment option of radical cystectomy, which includes removing the entire urinary bladder and a prostatectomy for men or total hysterectomy in women. While highly curative, this surgical procedure carries substantial risk for morbidity and mortality, and can negatively impact patient’s quality of life. Further, a significant proportion of patients are medically ineligible for a radical cystectomy, and even if eligible, refuse surgery and opt for other less effective treatments, which could compromise outcomes.

KEYTRUDA® is a fully humanized, Immunoglobulin G4, anti-PD-1, monoclonal antibody, that binds to the PD-1 receptor and blocks its interaction with ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2. By doing so, it unleashes the tumor-specific effector T cells, and is thereby able to undo PD-1 pathway-mediated inhibition of the immune response. KEYTRUDA® is presently approved by the FDA for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic Urothelial carcinoma who are not eligible for Cisplatin-containing chemotherapy or for those with disease progression during or following platinum-containing chemotherapy, based on its durable antitumor activity in this patient group. Upregulation of the PD-1 pathway has been observed in BCG-resistant NMIBC, suggesting that KEYTRUDA® may be of benefit in this group of patients.

This new FDA approval for KEYTRUDA® was based on the KEYNOTE-057 study, which is a multicenter, single-arm trial that enrolled 148 patients with high-risk NMIBC, of whom 96 patients had BCG-unresponsive CIS with or without papillary tumors. BCG-unresponsive high-risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer was defined as persistent disease despite adequate BCG therapy, disease recurrence after an initial tumor-free state following adequate BCG therapy, or T1 disease following a single induction course of BCG. Eligible patients had received adequate BCG therapy and were unable/unwilling to undergo radical cystectomy. All patients had undergone TransUrethral Resection of Bladder Tumor (TURBT) to remove resectable disease. Patients with residual Carcinoma In Situ, not amenable to complete resection were permitted. Patients received KEYTRUDA® 200 mg every 3 weeks until unacceptable toxicity, persistent or recurrent high-risk NMIBC or progressive disease, or up to 24 months of therapy without disease progression. The median age was 73 years and the median number of prior BCG instillations was 12. More than half of patients (56.9%) had a PD-L1 Combined Positive Score (CPS) of less than 10, and most patients in this analysis had refused prior cystectomy. The Primary end point was Complete Response Rate (CRR) as defined by negative results for cystoscopy with TURBT/biopsies as applicable, urine cytology, and CT Urography imaging. Secondary end points included Duration of Response and Safety.

At a median follow up was 28 months the Complete Response Rate was 41% and the median Duration of Response was 16.2 months. Forty-six percent (46%) of responding patients experienced a Complete Response lasting at least 12 months. The most frequent adverse reactions were fatigue, diarrhea, rash, pruritis, musculoskeletal pain, peripheral edema and hypothyroidism.

It was concluded from this study that KEYTRUDA® had encouraging activity in bladder cancer patients, with high-risk, BCG-unresponsive Carcinoma in Situ, with or without papillary tumors. The authors added that this study demonstrates that immune activation with systemically administered treatment can result in local activity in the bladder, as well as long-term durable remissions of cancer.
Keynote 057: Phase II trial of Pembrolizumab (pembro) for patients (pts) with high-risk (HR) nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) unresponsive to bacillus calmette-guérin (BCG). Balar AV, Kulkarni GS, Uchio EM, et al. J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl 7S; abstr 350)

FDA Approves IMFINZI® for Advanced Small Cell Lung Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: The FDA on March 27, 2020 approved IMFINZI® (Durvalumab) in combination with Etoposide and either Carboplatin or Cisplatin as first-line treatment for patients with Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (ES-SCLC). The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2020 about 228,820 new cases of lung cancer will be diagnosed and about 135,720 patients will die of the disease. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States. Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for approximately 13-15% of all lung cancers and is aggressive. Patients with extensive stage SCLC are often treated with a combination of Carboplatin or Cisplatin with Etoposide as first line treatment and the tumor response rates are as high as 60-80%. However, majority of the patients relapse within months of completing initial therapy, with a median Overall Survival (OS) of approximately 10 months. Patients often receive HYCAMTIN® (Topotecan) for recurrent or progressive SCLC (second-line treatment) and after failure on second-line therapy, treatment options are limited. The 5 year survival rate for Extensive Stage SCLC (ES-SCLC) is less than 5%, with a median survival of 9-10 months from the time of diagnosis.Unleashing-T-Cell-Function-with-PD-1-and-PD-L1-Antibodies

Based on the premise that SCLC has a high mutation rate, it was hypothesized that these tumors may be immunogenic and more recently immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors has demonstrated clinical activity in Extensive Stage SCLC. IMFINZI® (Durvalumab) is a selective, high-affinity, human IgG1 monoclonal antibody, that blocks the binding of Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) to Programmed Death 1 (PD-1) receptor and CD80, thereby unleashing the T cells to recognize and kill tumor cells.

IMFINZI® is approved by the FDA for the treatment of patients with locally advanced, unresectable Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, who have not progressed following chemoradiotherapy. Additionally, IMFINZI® is also approved for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic Urothelial carcinoma who have disease progression during or following Platinum-containing chemotherapy, or who have disease progression within 12 months of neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment with Platinum-containing chemotherapy.

This present FDA approval was based on CASPIAN trial, which is a multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label, Phase III study, in which the efficacy of IMFINZI® with or without CTLA-4 inhibitor Tremelimumab, in combination with Etoposide plus either Cisplatin or Carboplatin (Platinum-Etoposide), was compared to chemotherapy alone, in treatment-naive patients with ES-SCLC. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to IMFINZI® plus Platinum-Etoposide, IMFINZI® plus Tremelimumab plus Platinum-Etoposide, or Platinum-Etoposide alone. This study allocated 268 patients to the IMFINZI® plus Platinum-Etoposide group and 269 patients to the Platinum-Etoposide group. Treatment with Platinum-Etoposide consisted of Etoposide 80-100 mg/m2 IV on days 1-3 of each cycle with investigator’s choice of either Carboplatin AUC 5-6 mg/mL per min or Cisplatin 75-80 mg/m2 IV administered on day 1 of each cycle. Patients received up to four cycles of Platinum-Etoposide along with IMFINZI® 1500 mg IV with or without Tremelimumab 75 mg IV every 3 weeks, followed by maintenance IMFINZI® 1500 mg IV every 4 weeks in the immunotherapy treatment groups, or up to six cycles of Platinum-Etoposide IV every 3 weeks plus Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation (at the treating physicians discretion), in the Platinum-Etoposide control group. The median patient age was 62 years and 10% of the patients had CNS metastases. PCI was administered to 8% of patients in the Platinum-Etoposide group. The Primary endpoint was Overall Survival (OS). Additional efficacy outcome measures included Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Objective Response Rate (ORR). The authors reported the results for the IMFINZI® plus Platinum-Etoposide group, compared to the Platinum-Etoposide group, from a planned interim analysis.

The median OS was 13.0 months in the IMFINZI® plus chemotherapy group, compared with 10.3 months in the chemotherapy alone group (HR=0.73; P=0.0047), with a 27% reduction in the risk of death. Approximately 34% of patients who received IMFINZI® were alive at 18 months as compared to 25% in the control arm of the trial. Additionally, IMFINZI® plus chemotherapy demonstrated a higher PFS rate at 12 months (17.5% versus 4.7%), a 10.3% increase in confirmed ORR (67.9% versus 57.6%), and improved Duration of Response at 12 months (22.7% versus 6.3%). The most common adverse reactions noted were nausea, fatigue, asthenia, and alopecia.

It was concluded that the addition of IMFINZI® to first line Platinum-Etoposide chemotherapy combination significantly improved Overall Survival in patients with Extensive Stage-Small Cell Lung Cancer, when compared to chemotherapy alone.
Durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide versus platinum-etoposide in first-line treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (CASPIAN): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. Paz-Ares L, Dvorkin M, Chen Y, CASPIAN investigators, et al. Lancet. 2019;394:1929-1939

FDA Approves REBLOZYL® for Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes

RR

SUMMARY: The FDA on April 3, 2020 approved REBLOZYL® (Luspatercept-aamt) for the treatment of anemia, failing an Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agent, and requiring two or more RBC units over 8 weeks, in adult patients with very low- to intermediate-risk MyeloDysplastic Syndromes with Ring Sideroblasts (MDS-RS) or with Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative neoplasm with Ring Sideroblasts and Thrombocytosis (MDS/MPN-RS-T).

It is estimated that in the US approximately 13,000 people are diagnosed with MyeloDysplastic Syndromes (MDS) each year. MyeloDysplastic Syndromes are a heterogenous group of stem cell disorders characterized by marrow failure resulting in cytopenias with associated cytogenetic abnormalities, and abnormal cellular maturation with morphologic changes in clonal cells. Majority of the individuals diagnosed with MDS are aged 65 years and older and die as a result of infection and/or bleeding consequent to bone marrow failure. About a third of patients with MDS develop Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML).

Patients with Lower-risk MDS (Revised IPSS-Very Low, Low, or Intermediate risk ) often present with symptomatic anemia and these patients are in chronic need for RBC transfusions which in turn can result in iron overload and can have a negative impact on quality of life and Overall Survival. These patients are treated with Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents (ESAs) as first line therapy. ESAs such as Darbepoetin alfa and Epoetin alfa are re-engineered and recombinant DNA technology products of Erythropoietin (EPO), and they stimulate erythropoiesis by binding and activating the EPO receptor. However, transfusion-dependent patients with serum EPO levels above 200 U per liter are less likely to respond to ESAs. Additionally, patients with MDS with ring sideroblasts have a shorter median duration of response to ESAs, than those who do not have ring sideroblasts. Patients with Lower-risk MDS with chromosome 5q deletion (del 5q) who are transfusion dependent are treated with Lenalidomide, regardless of previous treatment with ESAs. In contrast, only 39% of patients with non-del(5q) Lower-risk MDS receive second line therapy besides RBC transfusions, and there are few treatment options for patients who are refractory to, unresponsive to, or ineligible for ESAs. There is therefore an unmet clinical need for safe and effective treatment options, to reduce the RBC transfusion burden in these patients.Luspartercept-Restores-Red-Blood-Cell's-Ability-to-Mature

Signaling by the SMAD2 and SMAD3 pathway exerts an inhibitory effect on red cell maturation. This pathway is constitutively activated in the bone marrow cells of patients with MDS and diseases associated with ineffective erythropoiesis such as β-thalassemia. REBLOZYL® (Luspatercept) is a recombinant soluble fusion protein and is first-in-class erythroid maturation agent that enhances erythropoiesis by promoting late-stage Red Blood Cell precursor differentiation and maturation. It targets select Transforming Growth Factor (TGF)-β superfamily ligands such as GDF11, that regulate late-stage erythropoiesis. This results in a reduction in aberrant SMAD2 and SMAD3 signaling, thereby promoting late-stage RBC precursor differentiation and maturation. In a Phase II study, treatment of Lower-risk MDS patients with REBLOZYL® resulted in 38% of patients being transfusion independent for 8 weeks or longer and this benefit was even more so among patients with 15% or more ring sideroblasts.

The MEDALIST trial is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase III study which evaluated the efficacy and safety of REBLOZYL® in patients with anemia secondary to MDS, defined as Very Low-Risk, Low-Risk, or Intermediate-Risk with Ring Sideroblasts, according to the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (R-IPSS). Eligible patients were refractory, intolerant, or ineligible to receive ESAs and required RBC transfusions. A total of 229 patients (N=229) were randomized 2:1 to receive either REBLOZYL® at a starting dose level of 1mg/kg SC with titration up to 1.75 mg/kg if needed (N=153), or placebo SC (N=76), every 3 weeks for 24 weeks or more. The median age was 71 years and median time from diagnosis was 41.8 months. Approximately 95% of patients had previously received ESAs and 90% had an SF3B1 mutation. SF3B1 mutation defines a homogeneous subgroup of MDS patients with Ring Sideroblasts, who have isolated erythroid dysplasia and favorable prognosis. The Primary endpoint was RBC transfusion independence for 8 weeks or more between week 1 and 24. A key Secondary endpoint was RBC transfusion independence for 12 weeks or more between week 1 and 24.

Among those receiving REBLOZYL®, 38% achieved the Primary endpoint of RBC transfusion independence for 8 weeks or more, compared with 13% receiving placebo (P<0.0001). Further among those receiving REBLOZYL®, 28% achieved the key Secondary endpoint of RBC transfusion independence for 12 weeks or more compared with 8% receiving placebo (P<0.001). The median duration of the longest, single continuous period of response to REBLOZYL® was 30.6 weeks, and 13.6 weeks in the placebo group. Among patients who had a baseline transfusion burden of 4 to less than 6 units per 8 weeks, 37% of those in the REBLOZYL® group and 4% of those in the placebo group had a response. Additionally, patients receiving REBLOZYL® were more likely to achieve an mHI-E (modified Hematologic Improvement-Erythroid) response, (defined as a reduction in transfusion of 4 or more RBC units per 8 weeks or a mean hemoglobin increase of 1.5 g/dL or more per 8 weeks, in the absence of transfusions), compared with patients receiving placebo (53% versus 12% during weeks 1-24; P<0.0001). A mean increase in hemoglobin level of at least 1 g/dL during weeks 1 to 24 was noted in 35% of patients who received REBLOZYL® and in 8% of patients who received placebo. The most common adverse events of any grade associated with REBLOZYL® included fatigue, diarrhea, asthenia, nausea and dizziness, and the incidence of adverse events decreased over time.

It was concluded that treatment with REBLOZYL® significantly reduced the severity of anemia in patients with Lower-risk MDS with ring sideroblasts, who had been RBC transfusion-dependent, and who had disease that was refractory to, or unlikely to respond to ESAs. Luspatercept in Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes. Fenaux P, Platzbecker U, Mufti GJ, et al. N Engl J Med 2020; 382:140-151

ENHERTU® Highly Effective in Heavily Pretreated HER2-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer 

RR

SUMMARY: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the US and about 1 in 8 women (13%) will develop invasive breast cancer during their lifetime. Approximately 276,480 new cases of invasive female breast cancer will be diagnosed in 2020 and about 42,170 women will die of the disease. The HER or erbB family of receptors consist of HER1, HER2, HER3 and HER4. Approximately 15-20% of invasive breast cancers overexpress HER2/neu oncogene, which is a negative predictor of outcomes without systemic therapy. Patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer are often treated with anti-HER2 targeted therapy along with chemotherapy, irrespective of hormone receptor status, and this has resulted in significantly improved treatment outcomes. HER2-targeted therapies include HERCEPTIN® (Trastuzumab), TYKERB® (Lapatinib), PERJETA® (Pertuzumab) and KADCYLA® (ado-Trastuzumab emtansine). Dual HER2 blockade with HERCEPTIN® and PERJETA®, given along with chemotherapy (with or without endocrine therapy), as first line treatment, in HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer patients, was shown to significantly improve Progression Free Survival (PFS) as well as Overall Survival (OS). The superior benefit with dual HER2 blockade has been attributed to differing mechanisms of action and synergistic interaction between HER2 targeted therapies. Patients progressing on Dual HER2 blockade often receive KADCYLA® which results in an Objective Response Rate (ORR) of 44% and a median PFS of 9.6 months, when administered after HERCEPTIN® and a taxane. There is however no standard treatment option for this patient population following progression on KADCYLA®.Mechanism-of-Action - ENHERTU
ENHERTU® (Trastuzumab Deruxtecan) is an Antibody-Drug Conjugate (ADC) composed of a humanized monoclonal antibody specifically targeting HER2, with the amino acid sequence similar to Trastuzumab, a cleavable tetrapeptide-based linker, and a potent cytotoxic Topoisomerase I inhibitor as the cytotoxic drug (payload). ENHERTU® has a favorable pharmacokinetic profile and the tetrapeptide-based linker is stable in the plasma and is selectively cleaved by cathepsins that are up-regulated in tumor cells. Unlike KADCYLA®, ENHERTU® has a higher drug-to-antibody ratio (8 versus 4), released payload easily crosses the cell membrane with resulting potent cytotoxic effect on neighboring tumor cells regardless of target expression, and the released cytotoxic agent (payload) has a short half-life, minimizing systemic exposure. In a Phase 1 dose-finding study involving patients with advanced HER2-positive breast cancer, treatment with ENHERTU® resulted in a confirmed response rate was 59.5%, and the median response duration was 20.7 months. However, the efficacy of ENHERTU® in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, previously treated with KADCYLA® remained unclear.
DESTINY-Breast 01 study is a multicenter, single-arm, Phase II registration trial, in which 184 patients with HER2-positive, metastatic breast cancer, who had received two or more prior HER2 targeted therapies including KADCYLA®, were enrolled. Patients received ENHERTU® 5.4 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The median age was 55 years, 53% had Hormone Receptor-positive tumors and the median number of previous lines of therapy for metastatic disease was SIX and included KADCYLA® (100%), Trastuzumab (100%), Pertuzumab (66%), and other anti-HER2 therapies (54%). The Primary end point was Objective Response Rate (ORR) assessed by Independent Central Review and Secondary endpoints included Duration of Response, Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS). The median follow up was 11.1 months.
The ORR was 60.9%, with 6% Complete Responses and 54.9% Partial Responses. The median time to response was 1.6 months and the median response duration was 14.8 months. The median PFS was 16.4 months the median OS was not reached at the time of this publication. The efficacy results were consistent across all key subgroups, including patients who had received previous PERJETA® (Pertuzumab) therapy. The most Grade 3 or higher adverse events were cytopenias, nausea, diarrhea and Interstitial Lung Disease.
It was concluded that ENHERTU® has a high level of clinical efficacy with a durable antitumor activity in a heavily pretreated patient population with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. The FDA in December 2019, granted accelerated approval to ENHERTU® (Trastuzumab deruxtecan) for patients with unresectable or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer, who have received two or more prior anti-HER2-based regimens in the metastatic setting. Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in Previously Treated HER2-Positive Breast Cancer. Modi S, Saura C, Yamashita T, et al. for the DESTINY-Breast01 Investigators. N Engl J Med 2020;382:610-621.

Bone-Targeting Radioisotope, XOFIGO® Improves Overall Survival in CRPC Patients with Bone Metastases 

RR

SUMMARY: Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in American men with the exclusion of skin cancer, and 1 in 9 men will be diagnosed with prostate cancer during their lifetime. It is estimated that in the United States, about 191,930 new cases of prostate cancer will be diagnosed in 2020 and 33,330 men will die of the disease. The skeletal system is the most common site for distant metastases among patients with prostate cancer and over 90% of patients with advanced prostate cancer develop bone metastases, which are osteoblastic (or sclerotic), characterized by deposition of new bone. Bone scan is the most common and cost effective modality for the diagnosis of bone metastases and Technetium (Tc) 99m-labeled methylene diphosphonate is the most widely used bone scanning agent. Agents such as ZOMETA® (Zoledronic acid) and XGEVA® (Denosumab) can prevent or delay Skeletal Related Events (SRE’s) and External Beam Radiation Therapy (EBRT) is often utilized to treat symptomatic SRE’s. EBRT can however damage the bone marrow in the radiated field, resulting in cytopenias, and consequently can potentially preclude patients from receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy.
Radium Ra 223 dichloride (XOFIGO®) is a bone seeking alpha particle emitter and by virtue of its chemical similarity to calcium is preferentially taken up by the bone and forms complexes with bone mineral, hydroxyapatite, in areas where there is increased bone turnover, such as bone metastases. XOFIGO® induces double stranded DNA breaks resulting in antitumor effects and has a very short range in tissues (around 2 and 10 cells), quickly losing energy, compared to beta or gamma radiation. The end result is less damage to the adjacent healthy tissues. Further, unlike Ra-226 which was first isolated by Madame Curie, XOFIGO® has a short half life of 11.4 days and rapidly decays, preventing significant radiation exposure.
Strontium-89 (METASTRON®) is a pure beta emitter and imitates the bio-distribution of calcium in vivo, and is avidly taken up into bony metastases where it has a biological half-life of about 50 days. The biological half-life in the normal bone is approximately 14 days. METASTRON® in two Phase III studies significantly reduced the appearance of new painful metastases, analgesic requirements, and serum PSA levels, compared with radiotherapy alone, among patients with metastatic prostate cancer, suggesting that METASTRON® is an effective systemic radiopharmaceutical for the palliation of bony metastases.Types-of-Radiation-and-Their-Penetrating-Power
In this publication, the authors assessed the Overall Survival (OS) benefit of both alpha emitting and beta emitting bone-targeted RadioIsotopes (RIs) in men with bone metastases from CRPC (Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer), treated with bone-targeted RIs, and further compared the effects of alpha emitting RIs with beta emitting RIs. This meta-analysis included Individual Patient Data of 2081 patients with CRPC and bone metastases from 6 randomized clinical trials, conducted between January 1993 and June 2013, and data was collected via PubMed, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and meeting proceedings. Patients included in this study had histologically proven diagnosis of prostate cancer and disease progression after both, surgical or chemical castration, and have evidence of bone metastasis. The median age of patients was 70 years and the proportion of patients with more than 6 bone metastases ranged from 67% to 86%. The median follow up was 26.7 months. The Primary end point of the study was Overall Survival (OS), and Secondary end points included Symptomatic Skeletal Event (SSE)-Free Survival and adverse events.
This analysis showed that an alpha emitting bone- targeted RI (XOFIGO®) was associated with a significantly higher Overall Survival and higher symptomatic Skeletal Event-Free Survival, whereas a beta emitting RI (METASTRON®) was not associated with these significant outcomes. Treatment with the alpha emitter (XOFIGO®) was associated with a significant 30% decreased risk of death when compared with no radioisotope use, whereas use of the beta emitter (METASTRON®) did not confer a significant survival benefit. Further, treatment with XOFIGO® was associated with a significant 35% decreased risk of symptomatic Skeletal Event-Free Survival, whereas treatment with METASTRON® was not associated with such benefit. In the subgroup analyses, men with the lowest serum PSA values appeared to benefit significantly more with the use of bone-targeted RI therapy compared with those with the highest serum PSA values. Hematological toxicities were more frequently observed in patients treated by RI compared with those treated without RI, and the type of radiation did not result in significant differences.
It was concluded from this meta-analysis that among patients with metastatic CRPC, a significant improvement of Overall Survival and symptomatic Skeletal Event-Free Survival was noted with bone-targeted alpha emitting bone- targeted RI (XOFIGO®), but not beta emitting RIs (METASTRON®). Overall Survival in Men With Bone Metastases From Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Treated With Bone-Targeting Radioisotopes: A Meta-analysis of Individual Patient Data From Randomized Clinical Trials. Terrisse S, Karamouza E, Parker CC, et al. for the MORPHEP Collaborative Group. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6:206-216

Antibiotic Use Significantly Decreases Efficacy of Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients with Advanced Cancer 

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that in 2020, there will be an estimated 1.8 million new cancer cases diagnosed and 606,520 cancer deaths in the United States. Immunotherapy with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized cancer care and has become one of the most effective treatment options by improving Overall Response Rate and prolongation of survival across multiple tumor types. These agents target Programmed cell Death protein-1 (PD-1), Programmed cell Death Ligand-1 (PD-L1), Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte-Associated protein-4 (CTLA-4), and many other important regulators of the immune system. Biomarkers predicting responses to ICI’s include Tumor Mutational Burden (TMB), Mismatch Repair (MMR) status, and Programmed cell Death Ligand 1 (PD‐L1) expression. Other biomarkers such as Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs), TIL‐derived Interferon‐γ, Neutrophil‐to‐Lymphocyte ratio, and peripheral cytokines, have also been proposed as predictors of response. It has been postulated that concomitant medications during therapy with ICIs such as baseline steroid use as well as treatment with antibiotics may negate or lessen the efficacy of ICIs.
Preclinical studies have suggested that immune-based therapies for cancer may have a very complex interplay with the host’s microbiome and there may be a relationship between gut bacteria and immune response to cancer. The crosstalk between microbiota in the gut and the immune system allows for the tolerance of commensal bacteria (normal microflora) and oral food antigens and at the same time enables the immune system to recognize and attack opportunistic bacteria. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors strongly rely on the influence of the host’s microbiome, and the gut microbial diversity enhances mucosal immunity, dendritic cell function, and antigen presentation. Broad-spectrum antibiotics can potentially alter the bacterial composition and diversity of our gut microbiota, by killing the good bacteria. It has been postulated that this may negate the benefits of immunotherapy and influence treatment outcomes.
This present study was conducted to assess the impact of antibiotic use at the time of ICI treatment, on the outcomes for patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors. This United Kingdom single institution retrospective analysis included 291 (N=291) patients with advanced cancer, treated with ICI (Melanoma N=179, Non‐Small Cell Lung Cancer N=64, and Renal Cell Carcinoma N=48), who received an ICI agent between January 1, 2015, and April 1, 2017. Antibiotic use (both single and multiple courses as well as prolonged use) during the periods 2 weeks before and 6 weeks after ICI treatment was investigated and data collected. The authors chose this time period, because the potential duration of modification of gut microbiota following antibiotic therapy can vary, for different classes of antibiotics.
Ninety two (N=92) patients in the analyzed cohort had antibiotic therapy during ICI treatment. The use of antibiotics during treatment with ICIs was significantly associated with shorter Progression Free Survival (median PFS 3.1 versus 6.3 months; P=0.003) and Overall Survival (median OS 10.4 versus 21.7 months; P=0.002). Administration of a single course of antibiotics was associated with a non-significant reduction in PFS and OS, whereas patients who had received cumulative courses of antibiotics had significantly worse PFS (median PFS, 2.8 months; P=0.026) and OS (median OS, 6.3 months; P=0.009). Cumulative use of antibiotics was an independent significant prognostic factor for clinical outcomes among patients treated with ICIs. 
It was concluded from this large, multivariate analysis that antibiotic use is an independent negative predictor of PFS and OS in patients with advanced cancer treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors, with worse treatment outcomes among patients who had received multiple or prolonged courses of antibiotics. The authors added that this is the first study to suggest an adverse effect of cumulative antibiotic use, in patients receiving treatment with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for advanced cancer. Cumulative Antibiotic Use Significantly Decreases Efficacy of Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients with Advanced Cancer. Tinsley N, Zhou C, Tan G, et al. Oncologist. 2020;25:55-63.

FDA Approves OPDIVO®/YERVOY® Combination for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma 

RR

SUMMARY: The FDA on March 10, 2020, granted accelerated approval to the combination of OPDIVI® (Nivolumab) and YERVOY® (Ipilimumab) for patients with HepatoCellular Carcinoma (HCC) who have been previously treated with NEXAVAR® (Sorafenib). The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2020, about 42,810 new cases of primary liver cancer will be diagnosed in the US and 30,160 patients will die of their disease. Liver cancer is seen more often in men than in women, and the incidence has more than tripled since 1980. This increase has been attributed to the higher rate of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infection among baby boomers (born between 1945 through 1965). Obesity and Type II diabetes have also likely contributed to the trend. Other risk factors include alcohol, which increases liver cancer risk by about 10% per drink per day, and tobacco use which increases liver cancer risk by approximately 50%. HepatoCellular Carcinoma is the second most common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide and majority of patients typically present at an advanced stage. The prognosis for unresectable HCC remains poor and one year survival rate is less than 50% following diagnosis. NEXAVAR® was approved by the FDA in 2007 for the first line treatment of unresectable HepatoCellular Carcinoma (HCC) and the median Overall Survival was 10.7 months in the NEXAVAR® group and 7.9 months in the placebo group.
Immune checkpoints are cell surface inhibitory proteins/receptors that are expressed on activated T cells. They harness the immune system and prevent uncontrolled immune reactions by switching off the T cells of the immune system. Immune checkpoint proteins/receptors include CTLA-4 (Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Antigen 4, also known as CD152) and PD-1(Programmed cell Death 1). Checkpoint inhibitors unleash the T cells resulting in T cell proliferation, activation, and a therapeutic response.
OPDIVO® (Nivolumab) is a fully human, immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal antibody that binds to the PD-1 receptor and blocks its interaction with PD-L1 and PD-L2, thereby undoing PD-1 pathway-mediated inhibition of the immune response and unleashing the T cells. OPDIVO® was approved by the FDA in 2017, for the treatment of HCC, in patients who have been previously treated with NEXAVAR®. YERVOY® is a fully human immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody that blocks Immune checkpoint protein/receptor CTLA-4 (Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Antigen 4).
The present FDA approval was based on the CheckMate-040 study, which is an ongoing Phase I/II, open-label, multi-cohort study, investigating OPDIVO® or OPDIVO®-based combinations in patients with advanced HCC with and without Chronic Viral Hepatitis, who are naïve, intolerant to, or who have progressed during NEXAVAR® therapy. The OPDIVO® plus YERVOY® cohort of CheckMate-040 evaluated the Safety and Efficacy of the combination, in patients with previously treated advanced HCC. This cohort included a total of 49 patients with HCC who progressed on or were intolerant to NEXAVAR®. Patients received OPDIVO® 1 mg/kg IV in combination with YERVOY® 3 mg/kg IV, every 3 weeks for four doses, followed by single agent OPDIVO® 240 mg IV every 2 weeks, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The main efficacy endpoints were Overall Response Rate (ORR) and Duration of Response (DoR), as determined by Blinded Independent Central Review.
At a median follow up of 28 months, the ORR with the OPDIVO® plus YERVOY® combination was 33%, with 8% Complete Responses (CR) and a 24% Partial Responses. The Duration of Responses ranged from 4.6 to over 30.5 months, with 31% of responses lasting at least 24 months. The most common adverse events with this combination therapy were fever, fatigue, diarrhea, rash, arthralgia, dyspnea, and hypothyroidism.
It was concluded that dual Immuno-Oncology therapy with a combination of OPDIVO® plus YERVOY® represents an important milestone, for patients with advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/resources-information-approved-drugs/fda-grants-accelerated-approval-nivolumab-and-ipilimumab-combination-hepatocellular-carcinoma