Author: RR

FDA Approves Adjuvant Therapy with SUTENT® in High-Risk Renal Cell Carcinoma after Nephrectomy

RR

SUMMARY: The FDA on November 16, 2017 approved SUTENT® (Sunitinib malate) for the adjuvant treatment of adult patients at high risk of recurrent Renal Cell Carcinoma following nephrectomy. The American Cancer Society estimates that about 62,700 new cases of kidney cancer will be diagnosed in the United States in 2016 and over 14,000 patients will die from this disease. The prognosis for patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) is dependent on the stage of disease and risk factors. Two validated models, the University of California Los Angeles Integrated Staging System (UISS) and the Stage, Size, Grade, and Necrosis (SSIGN) score were developed, to assess the risk for relapse. UISS is based on ECOG Performance Status, Fuhrman nuclear grading and TNM pathological stage, whereas the SSIGN score takes Stage, Size, Grade and Necrosis into consideration. Approximately 16% of patients with RCC present with Locoregional disease, and up to 40% of these patients relapse with metastatic disease, following nephrectomy. The 5-year survival for locoregional (stage III) disease is 53%, and 8% for metastatic disease. The standard management of high risk patients following nephrectomy has been surveillance, as there has been limited data demonstrating the benefit of adjuvant therapy in reducing the risk of relapse.MOA of SUTENT

SUTENT® (Sunitinib) is a MultiKinase Inhibitor (MKI) which simultaneously targets the tumor cell wall, vascular endothelial cell wall as well as the pericyte/fibroblast/vascular/ smooth vessel cell wall and is capable of specifically binding to tyrosine kinases, inhibiting the earlier signaling events and thereby inhibits phosphorylation of VEGF receptor, PDGF receptor, FLT-3 and c-KIT. SUTENT® is indicated for the treatment of advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma and in a multi-center, randomized study, demonstrated superior Progression Free Survival and Objective Response Rate, when compared with Interferon Alfa, in patients with treatment-naïve Renal Cell Carcinoma. The authors in this study examined the efficacy and safety of SUTENT® in patients with locally advanced RCC, at high risk for tumor recurrence, following nephrectomy.

Sunitinib as Adjuvant Treatment for Patients at High Risk of Recurrence of Renal Cell Carcinoma Following Nephrectomy (S-TRAC) is a randomized, double blind, phase III trial in which 615 patients with locoregional, high risk, clear cell Renal Cell Carcinoma were randomly assigned to receive SUTENT® (N=309) or placebo (N=306). Treatment consisted of either SUTENT® 50 mg PO daily or placebo, on a 4-weeks-on, 2-weeks-off schedule, for 1 year or until disease recurrence or unacceptable toxicity. Eligible patients had tumor Stage III or higher, regional lymph node metastasis, or both and were required to have absence of macroscopic residual or metastatic disease after nephrectomy, as confirmed by a CT scan. The primary end point was Disease Free Survival and secondary end points included Overall Survival, and Safety.

It was noted that the median duration of Disease Free Survival was 6.8 years in the SUTENT® group and 5.6 years in the placebo group (HR=0.76; P=0.03). Overall Survival data were not mature at the time of this analysis. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were more frequent in the SUTENT® group compared to the placebo group and dose reductions, dose interruptions and discontinuations were more frequent in the SUTENT® group as well. The most commonly reported adverse events were skin toxicity (palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia), hypertension, and fatigue, with declines in quality of life while on active therapy. In a previously published adjuvant trial (ASSURE trial), there was no improvement in Disease Free Survival in patients receiving Sunitinib or Sorafenib as compared with placebo. This has been attributed to the ASSURE trial including many patients with early (Stage 1) tumors as well as those with non-clear cell histology. Additionally, the dosing schedule in the ASSURE trial was lower than this present study.

It was concluded that adjuvant treatment with SUTENT® following nephrectomy in patients with high risk disease, results in significantly improved Disease Free Survival but this benefit may be associated with higher rate of toxicities during treatment. Adjuvant Sunitinib in High-Risk Renal-Cell Carcinoma after Nephrectomy. Ravaud A, Motzer RJ, Pandha HS, et al. for the S-TRAC Investigators. N Engl J Med 2016; 375:2246-2254

FDA Approves ADCETRIS® for Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma

RR

SUMMARY: The FDA on November 9, 2017 granted regular approval to ADCETRIS® (Brentuximab vedotin), for the treatment of adult patients with primary cutaneous Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (pcALCL) or CD30-expressing Mycosis Fungoides (MF), who have received prior systemic therapy. Primary Cutaneous T Cell Lymphoma (CTCL) is a type of Non Hodgkin Lymphoma and includes a spectrum of diseases that primarily involve the skin, but may ultimately involve lymph nodes, blood and visceral organs such as spleen, liver and lungs. The prevalence in the US is approximately 16,000-20,000 patients and the incidence is higher in blacks than Caucasians or Asians. It is more common in men, and the median age at diagnosis is 50 years. Mycosis Fungoides/Sezary Syndrome is the most common type of CTCL accounting for 44% of cases. Patients with Stage I disease have an excellent prognosis. However for those with advanced disease, durable responses are rare with present available therapies and outcomes are poor.Classification of T-Cell Lymphomas

ADCETRIS® (Brentuximab vedotin) is an Antibody-Drug Conjugate (ADC) that targets CD30. ADCETRIS® consists of the anti-CD30 monoclonal antibody SGN-30 conjugated to the cytotoxic agent, MonoMethyl Auristatin E (MMAE) via a peptide linker. When administered intravenously, ADCETRIS® is internalized by CD30 expressing tumor cells, causing the release of MMAE into the cytosol through the enzymatic cleavage of the peptide linker.

The FDA approval was based on international, multicentre, open-label, randomized, phase III trial (ALCANZA), which enrolled 131 previously treated patients with CD30-positive Mycosis Fungoides (MF) or primary cutaneous Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (pcALCL). Patients with MF were required to have received at least one prior systemic therapy and those with pcALCL were required to have prior radiation therapy or at least one systemic therapy. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive ADCETRIS® 1.8 mg/kg IV once every 3 weeks, for up to 16 cycles (N=66), or physician's choice of Methotrexate 5-50 mg orally once per week or Bexarotene 300 mg/m2 orally once daily for up to 48 weeks (N=65). There were more pcALCL patients with extracutaneous disease in the ADCETRIS® group (44% versus 27%). The Primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving an Objective Response Rate lasting at least 4 months (ORR4). Secondary outcome measures included Complete Response (CR) rate, Progression Free Survival (PFS), and reduction in the burden of symptoms during treatment.

At a median follow-up of 22.9 months, the proportion of patients achieving an objective global response lasting at least 4 months was 56.3% with ADCETRIS® versus 12.5% with physician's choice of treatment (P<0.0001). The CR rate in the ADCETRIS® group was 16% versus 2% in the physicians choice group (P=0.007). The median PFS was 16.7 months in the ADCETRIS® arm versus 3.7 months in the physicians choice arm (HR=0.27; P<0.001). The most common adverse reactions in those patients receiving ADCETRIS®: were anemia, neutropenia, peripheral neuropathy, nausea, diarrhea and fatigue. The most common adverse event leading to treatment discontinuation was peripheral neuropathy.

It was concluded that treatment with ADCETRIS® resulted in significant improvement in Objective Response Rate and Progression Free Survival, among patients with advanced CD30-positive Mycosis Fungoides or primary cutaneous Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma, fulfilling an unmet need for this patient group. Brentuximab vedotin or physician's choice in CD30-positive cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (ALCANZA): an international, open-label, randomised, phase 3, multicentre trial. Prince HM, Kim YH, Horwitz SM, et al. Lancet. 2017;390:555-566.

Long Term Risk of Breast Cancer Recurrence after Stopping Endocrine Therapy at 5 Years

RR

SUMMARY: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the US and about 1 in 8 women (12%) will develop invasive breast cancer during their lifetime. It is estimated that 252,710 new cases of invasive breast cancer and 63,410 new cases of non-invasive breast cancer will be diagnosed in women in 2017 and 40,610 women are expected to die from the disease.

It has been well established that treatment with 5 years of endocrine therapy in early stage, Estrogen Receptor (ER) positive breast cancer, significantly reduces the risks of locoregional and distant recurrence, contralateral breast cancer, death from breast cancer, and therefore death from any cause. Extended adjuvant endocrine therapy with either Tamoxifen or an Aromatase Inhibitor (AI) beyond 5 years can further reduce breast cancer recurrence. This however can result in treatment related side effects. Therefore, when considering extended adjuvant endocrine therapy beyond 5 years, the potential benefits should be weighed against the associated risk with such therapy. The absolute benefit of continuing endocrine therapy after 5 years depends on the absolute risk of later recurrence, if patient’s receives no further therapy.

The authors in this publication reported the influence of original tumor characteristics, on the incidence of breast cancer outcomes, over a 20 year period. This meta-analysis included data from 88 trials in the Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) database of randomized trials, involving 62,923 women with ER-positive breast cancer, who were disease-free after 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy. Data was analyzed from women who had T1 disease (Tumor diameter 2 cm or less) or T2 disease (Tumor diameter more than 2 cm up to 5 cm), no positive nodes (N0), 1-3 positive nodes (N1-3), 4-9 positive nodes (N4-9), and no distant metastases. The authors then assessed the associations of Tumor diameter and Nodal status (TN), tumor grade, and other factors with patients’ outcomes, during the period from 5 to 20 years.

It was noted that distant breast cancer recurrences occurred at a steady rate for at least another 15 years after completing 5 years of adjuvant hormonal treatment. The risk of distant recurrence strongly correlated with the original Tumor diameter and Nodal status (TN status).

Among women with T1 disease, the risk of distant recurrence was 13% in those with T1N0 disease, 20% in those with T1N1-3 disease and 34% in those with T1N4-9 disease. Even in those women with low grade T1N0 breast cancer, the absolute risk of distant recurrence from 5-20 years was 10%.

Among those with T2 disease, the risk of distant recurrence was 19% with T2N0 disease, 26% with T2N1-3 disease, and 41% with T2N4-9 disease. TN status was also a strong determinant of locoregional recurrence, but not predictive for contralateral breast cancer.

There was a strong association of tumor grade and Ki-67 status with the risk of distant recurrence during the first 5 years but had limited additional prognostic relevance during years 5-20. Similarly, patients with negative Progesterone Receptor (PR) had a worse prognosis during the first 5 years but not thereafter.

The authors concluded that even after 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy, women with ER-positive, early stage breast cancer, continue to be at risk for recurrence and death from breast cancer, for at least 20 years after the original diagnosis. This risk varies from 10-41% and is strongly dependent on TN status at the time of initial diagnosis. Even those with low-grade T1N0 disease were at an appreciable risk of distant recurrence. Extended adjuvant endocrine therapy beyond 5 years may reduce this risk, and this study highlights the need for new approaches to reduce late recurrence. 20-Year Risks of Breast-Cancer Recurrence after Stopping Endocrine Therapy at 5 Years. Pan H, Gray R, Braybrooke J, et al. for the EBCTCG. N Engl J Med 2017; 377:1836-1846

TAGRISSO® Superior to First Generation EGFR TKIs in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

RR

Approximately 10% to 15% of Caucasian patients and 35-50% of Asian patients with Adenocarcinomas, harbor activating EGFR (Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor) mutations and 90% of these mutations are either Exon 19 deletions or L858R point mutations in Exon 21. EGFR-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) such as TARCEVA® (Erlotinib), IRESSA® (Gefitinib) and GILOTRIF® (Afatinib), have demonstrated a 60% to 70% response rate as monotherapy when administered as first line treatment, in patients with metastatic NSCLC, who harbor the sensitizing EGFR mutations. However, majority of these patients experience disease progression within 9 to 14 months. This resistance to frontline EGFR TKI therapy has been attributed to acquired T790M “gatekeeper” point mutation in EGFR, identified in 50% – 60% of patients.
TAGRISSO® (Osimertinib), is a third-generation Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) TKI and in a randomized, double blind, phase III clinical trial, demonstrated superior efficacy and tolerability compared to the Standard of Care, as first-line therapy in patients with advanced EGFR mutation positive NSCLC. This benefit was seen even in those with CNS metastases at study entry. These new finding are very likely to change the treatment paradigm for NSCLC patients whose tumors harbor EGFR mutations.

 

MisMatch Repair Deficiency and MicroSatellite Instability May Predict Perioperative Chemotherapy Benefit in Operable GastroEsophageal Cancers

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that about 28,000 new cases of stomach cancer will be diagnosed in the United States for 2017 and about 10,960 people will die of this disease. It is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the world. Patients with operable Gastric or GastroEsophageal adenocarcinoma frequently receive perioperative or neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to surgical resection, as this has been associated with a modest improvement in Overall Survival (OS), compared with surgery alone. However, approximately 50% of the patients undergoing surgical resection will die of recurrent disease. Further perioperative chemotherapy can be associated with significant toxicities. For patients with GastroEsophageal cancer receiving neoadjuvant treatment, there are presently no validated prognostic biomarkers, and patient selection is based on preoperative clinical staging.

The DNA MisMatchRepair (MMR) system is responsible for molecular surveillance and works as an editing tool that identifies errors within the microsatellite regions of DNA and removes them. Defective MMR system leads to MSI (Micro Satellite Instability) and hypermutation, triggering an enhanced antitumor immune response. MSI (Micro Satellite Instability) is therefore a hallmark of defective/deficient DNA MisMatchRepair (MMR) system and occurs in 15% of all colorectal cancers. Defective MisMatchRepair can be a sporadic or heritable event. Approximately 65% of the MSI colon tumors are sporadic and when sporadic, the DNA MisMatchRepair gene is MLH1. Defective MisMatchRepair can also manifest as a germline mutation occurring in 1 of the 4 MisMatchRepair genes which include MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2. This produces Lynch Syndrome (Hereditary Nonpolyposis ColoRectal Carcinoma – HNPCC), an autosomal dominant disorder and is the most common form of hereditary colon cancer, accounting for 35% of the MSI colorectal cancers. MSI tumors tend to have better outcomes and this has been attributed to the abundance of Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes in these tumors, from increased immunogenicity. These tumors are susceptible to PD-1 blockade and respond to treatment with checkpoint inhibitors such as KEYTRUDA® (N Engl J Med 372:2509-2520, 2015). Other MSI-High and dMMR (MMR deficient) tumors include, Endometrial and GastroIntestinal tumors and to a lesser extent Breast, Prostate, Bladder and Thyroid tumors.

MSI (Micro Satellite Instability) testing is performed using a PCR based assay and MSI-High refers to instability at 2 or more of the 5 mononucleotide repeat markers and MSI-Low refers to instability at 1 of the 5 markers. Patients are considered Micro Satellite Stable (MSS) if no instability occurs. MSI-L and MSS are grouped together because MSI-L tumors are uncommon and behave similar to MSS tumors. Tumors considered MSI-H have deficiency of one or more of the DNA MisMatchRepair genes. MMR gene deficiency can be detected by ImmunoHistoChemistry (IHC). MLH1 gene is often lost in association with PMS2. Approximately 10-20% of Gastric cancers are MSI high or MMR Deficient. Several retrospective studies have suggested favorable outcomes in patients with Gastric cancer with high MSI tumors, although none of these studies had a control group.

In the MAGIC trial (The UK Medical Research Council Adjuvant Gastric Infusional Chemotherapy), which is an open-label, multicenter, phase III study, patients with resectable GastroEsophageal cancer were randomized to receive either 6 cycles of perioperative Epirubicin, Cisplatin, and Infusional 5-FU (3 cycles before and 3 cycles after resection) plus surgery, or undergo surgery alone. In this study, patients treated with perioperative chemotherapy had improved Overall Survival (OS) compared with patients treated with surgery alone (5-year OS 36% versus 23%; HR=0.75; P=0.009).

The authors in this study additionally evaluated patients with operable GastroEsophageal cancers with High MicroSatellite Instability (MSI-H) or MMR deficiency (dMMR), and compared their survival with patients who had MicroSatellite Stable (MSS) GastroEsophageal cancer, when these patients were treated with surgery alone or surgery plus perioperative chemotherapy. The authors thus assessed survival outcomes based on MSI/MMR deficiency. Of the 503 clinical trial participants, MSI results were available for 303 patients and both MSI and MMR results were available in 254 patients. Patients who had High MSI or MMR deficiency treated with surgery alone, had a median OS that was Not Reached (NR) compared with a median Overall Survival (OS) of 20.5 months, among those who had neither high MSI nor MMR deficiency (HR=0.42; P=0.09). In contrast, patients who had either a High MSI or MMR deficiency, treated with surgery plus perioperative chemotherapy had a median OS of 9.6 months compared with a median OS of 19.5 months, among those who had neither High MSI nor MMR deficiency (HR=2.18; P=0.03). The overall concordance rate between MSI-H and MMR deficient status was 97.6%.

Based on these findings the authors concluded that patients with operable GastroEsophageal cancer with High MicroSatellite Instability or MMR deficiency, did not benefit from perioperative chemotherapy and could be spared from the toxicities of chemotherapy. These patients may benefit from therapy with PD-1 inhibitors, although this will need to be further investigated. If independently validated, MSI or MMR deficiency, determined by preoperative biopsies, could be used to select patients for perioperative chemotherapy. Mismatch Repair Deficiency, Microsatellite Instability, and Survival. An Exploratory Analysis of the Medical Research Council Adjuvant Gastric Infusional Chemotherapy (MAGIC) Trial. Smyth EC, Wotherspoon A, Peckitt C, et al. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3:1197-1203.

TAGRISSO® Superior to First Generation EGFR TKIs in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: Lung cancer is the second most common cancer in both men and women and accounts for about 13% of all new cancers and 27% of all cancer deaths. The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2017 about 222,500 new cases of lung cancer will be diagnosed and over 155,000 patients will die of the disease. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States. Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of all lung cancers. Of the three main subtypes of Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 30% are Squamous Cell Carcinomas (SCC), 40% are Adenocarcinomas and 10% are Large cell carcinomas. With changes in the cigarette composition and decline in tobacco consumption over the past several decades, Adenocarcinoma now is the most frequent histologic subtype of lung cancer. Approximately 10% to 15% of Caucasian patients and 35-50% of Asian patients with Adenocarcinomas, harbor activating EGFR (Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor) mutations and 90% of these mutations are either Exon 19 deletions or L858R point mutations in Exon 21. EGFR-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) such as TARCEVA® (Erlotinib), IRESSA® (Gefitinib) and GILOTRIF® (Afatinib), have demonstrated a 60% to 70% response rate as monotherapy when administered as first line treatment, in patients with metastatic NSCLC, who harbor the sensitizing EGFR mutations. However, majority of these patients experience disease progression within 9 to 14 months. This resistance to frontline EGFR TKI therapy has been attributed to acquired T790M “gatekeeper” point mutation in EGFR, identified in 50% – 60% of patients.

TAGRISSO® (Osimertinib), is a third-generation Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) TKI presently approved by the FDA, for the treatment of patients with metastatic EGFR T790M mutation-positive NSCLC, who had progressed on prior systemic therapy, including an EGFR-TKI. Previously published studies suggested that TAGRISSO® may also be effective as initial therapy for EGFR mutation-positive advanced NSCLC.

FLAURA is a randomized, double blind, phase III clinical trial, conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of first line TAGRISSO® to TARCEVA® or IRESSA® (which are considered Standard of Care as first line therapy), in NSCLC patients with activating mutations EGFR Exon 19 deletions or L858R substitution mutation on Exon 21. This study randomized 556 advanced NSCLC treatment naïve patients, with EGFR Exon 19 or 21 mutations in a 1:1 ratio, to TAGRISSO® 80 mg orally once daily (N=279) or Standard of Care EGFR-TKI, IRESSA® 250 mg or TARCEVA® 150 mg, orally once daily (N=277). Patients were stratified by mutation status (Exon 19 vs 21 mutations) and race (Asian vs non-Asian). Patients with CNS metastases who were neurologically stable, were allowed in this study. The Primary endpoint was Progression Free Survival (PFS).

The median PFS was 18.9 months with TAGRISSO® compared to 10.2 months for the standard therapy (HR=0.46; P<0.0001), suggesting a 54% reduction in the risk of disease progression, compared with Standard of Care. TAGRISSO® extended the median Time To Progression by about 9 months. This PFS benefit was consistent across all subgroups of patients, including those with and without CNS metastases at study entry. The Objective Response Rate (ORR) with TAGRISSO® was 80% compared with 76% for TARCEVA® and IRESSA®. The median Duration of Response with TAGRISSO® was 17.2 versus 8.5 months in the comparator arm. The median Overall Survival was not reached. Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were lower for TAGRISSO® (34%) compared with 45% for TARCEVA® and IRESSA®. Toxicities led to treatment discontinuation for 13% and 18% of patients in the TAGRISSO® and comparator groups, respectively.

It was concluded that TAGRISSO® demonstrated superior efficacy and tolerability compared to the Standard of Care, as first-line therapy in patients with advanced EGFR mutation positive NSCLC. Studies are underway, assessing treatments, following resistance to TAGRISSO®. Osimertinib vs standard of care (SoC) EGFR-TKI as first-line therapy in patients (pts) with EGFRm advanced NSCLC: FLAURA. Ramalingam S, Reungwetwattana T, Chewaskulyong B, et al. Presented at: 2017 ESMO Congress; Madrid, Spain; September 9-12, 2017. Abstract LBA2_PR.

Alcohol and Cancer A Statement of the American Society of Clinical Oncology

RR

Alcohol consumption is an established risk factor for several malignancies, and is a potentially modifiable risk factor for cancer. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), a branch of WHO, classified alcohol as a group 1 carcinogen. The American Heart Association, American Cancer Society, and US Department of Health and Human Services all recommend that men limit intake to one to two drinks per day and women to one drink per day. People who do not currently drink alcohol should not start for any reason. There is a clear association between alcohol and upper aerodigestive tract cancers (larynx, esophagus, and oral cavity/pharynx). A recent meta-analysis of cohort studies among 209,597 cancer survivors showed an 8% increase in overall mortality and a 17% increased risk for recurrence in the highest versus lowest alcohol consumers. The benefit of alcohol consumption on cardiovascular health likely has been overstated and the net effect of alcohol is harmful. Alcohol consumption should therefore not be recommended to prevent cardiovascular disease or all-cause mortality.

GAZYVA® (Obinutuzumab)

RR

The FDA on November 16, 2017, granted regular approval to GAZYVA® in combination with chemotherapy, followed by GAZYVA® monotherapy, in patients achieving at least a Partial Remission, for the treatment of adult patients with previously untreated Stage II bulky, III, or IV Follicular Lymphoma (FL). GAZYVA® is a product of Genentech, Inc.

SPRYCEL® (Dasatinib)

RR

The FDA on November 9, 2017, granted regular approval to SPRYCEL®, for the treatment of pediatric patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) in the Chronic Phase. SPRYCEL® is a product of Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.